Essay on The judiciary in English

Hello friends,

The judiciary is one of the three branches of government, alongside the executive and legislative branches. It is responsible for interpreting and enforcing the laws of a country, and for ensuring that justice is served.

The judiciary consists of judges, lawyers, and other legal professionals who work within the court system. In most countries, the judiciary is an independent branch of government, meaning that it is free from interference or control by the other branches.

The main functions of the judiciary include:

Interpreting the Law: The judiciary is responsible for interpreting and applying the laws of a country. This involves interpreting the language of laws and legal precedents, and deciding how they should be applied in specific cases.

Adjudicating Disputes: The judiciary is responsible for resolving disputes between individuals, organizations, and the government. This can involve criminal trials, civil lawsuits, and administrative hearings.

Ensuring Justice: The judiciary is responsible for ensuring that justice is served in accordance with the law. This involves upholding the rights of individuals, protecting the interests of society, and ensuring that the rule of law is followed.

Protecting Rights: The judiciary is responsible for protecting the constitutional rights of citizens, including freedom of speech, religion, and association, as well as the right to due process and equal protection under the law.

In most countries, the judiciary is structured as a hierarchy of courts, with higher courts having the authority to review and overturn decisions made by lower courts. This system helps to ensure that legal decisions are consistent and fair, and that justice is served at all levels of the court system.

Download GK Notes

Judicial activism. (1997)

Judicial activism is a term used to describe a court’s willingness to interpret the law broadly and to use its power to make new law or to strike down existing laws as unconstitutional. It is generally seen as a departure from the traditional view of the judiciary as an impartial arbiter of the law, and has been the subject of much debate and controversy.

The concept of judicial activism emerged in the United States in the mid-20th century, during a period of social and political change. Some judges and legal scholars argued that the courts had a duty to take an active role in protecting individual rights and promoting social justice, even if it meant departing from traditional legal principles or striking down laws passed by elected officials.

In 1997, the Indian Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, which is often cited as an example of judicial activism. The case involved a petition by a group of women’s rights activists who argued that the Indian government had failed to protect women from sexual harassment in the workplace. The Supreme Court, in a historic decision, held that sexual harassment was a violation of the fundamental rights of women under the Indian Constitution, and ordered the government to take steps to prevent and redress such harassment.

Critics of judicial activism argue that it undermines the democratic process and gives judges too much power to make policy decisions that should be left to elected officials. They also argue that it can lead to inconsistent and unpredictable legal decisions, and that it can make it harder for businesses and other organizations to plan for the future.

Supporters of judicial activism, on the other hand, argue that it is necessary to protect individual rights and to promote social justice, particularly in cases where elected officials are unlikely to act. They also argue that it helps to ensure that the government is accountable to the people and that the law reflects changing social and economic conditions.

Judicial activism and Indian democracy. (2004)

Judicial activism has been a subject of debate in India for several decades. In the context of Indian democracy, judicial activism refers to the courts taking an active role in shaping public policy, often by expanding the scope of fundamental rights guaranteed by the Indian Constitution.

The Indian Constitution provides for a system of checks and balances, with the judiciary being an independent and powerful branch of government. The Supreme Court of India has often used its powers to strike down laws and policies that it deems unconstitutional, and to issue directions to the government on a wide range of issues.

Proponents of judicial activism argue that it is necessary to protect the rights of citizens, particularly those who are marginalized or disadvantaged. They argue that the government has often been unwilling or unable to act to protect these rights, and that the judiciary must step in to ensure justice.

Opponents of judicial activism, on the other hand, argue that it undermines the democratic process by giving unelected judges the power to make policy decisions. They also argue that it can lead to inconsistent and unpredictable legal decisions, and that it can make it difficult for the government to plan and implement policies.

In 2004, the Indian Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the case of Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy v. Union of India, which is often cited as an example of judicial activism. The case involved a petition by the families of victims of a fire in a cinema in New Delhi, which had killed 59 people. The Supreme Court ordered compensation for the victims, and directed the government to take steps to improve safety standards in public places.

While some critics argue that this decision was an example of judicial overreach, many others view it as an important step towards ensuring accountability and justice for victims of disasters. Overall, the role of judicial activism in Indian democracy remains a subject of debate and discussion, with advocates and critics on both sides of the issue.

Justice must reach the poor. (2005)

Access to justice is a fundamental right that is guaranteed to all citizens under the Indian Constitution. However, for many poor and marginalized communities in India, this right remains out of reach due to a variety of social, economic, and political factors.

In 2005, the Indian Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the case of Hussainara Khatoon v. State of Bihar, which highlighted the issue of access to justice for the poor. The case involved a petition by a group of undertrial prisoners who had been languishing in jail for several years without trial. The Supreme Court, in a historic decision, held that the right to a speedy trial was a fundamental right guaranteed by the Indian Constitution, and directed the government to take steps to ensure that trials were conducted more efficiently.

While the Hussainara Khatoon decision was an important step towards improving access to justice for the poor, much work remains to be done. Many poor communities in India continue to face significant barriers to accessing the justice system, including lack of legal awareness, financial constraints, and discrimination by the police and other officials.

To address these issues, the Indian government has taken a number of steps in recent years to improve access to justice for the poor. These include setting up legal aid clinics and mobile legal services in rural areas, providing free legal assistance to marginalized communities, and increasing the number of judges and courts in areas with high caseloads.

Despite these efforts, however, significant challenges remain in ensuring that justice reaches the poor. To address these challenges, it will be important to continue to invest in legal aid and other support services for marginalized communities, to strengthen the capacity of the justice system to handle complex cases, and to address the underlying social and economic inequalities that contribute to the marginalization of poor communities.

More Related PDF Download

Maths Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download	English Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download
GK/GS/GA Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download	Reasoning Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download
Indian Polity Free PDF >Click Here To Download	History Free PDF > Click Here To Download
Computer Topicwise Short Tricks >Click Here To Download	EnvironmentTopicwise Free PDF > Click Here To Download
UPSC Notes >Click Here To Download	SSC Notes Download > Click Here To Download

Topic Related Pdf Download